Sharp Sensitivity Analysis for Inverse Propensity Weighting via Quantile Balancing
نویسندگان
چکیده
Inverse propensity weighting (IPW) is a popular method for estimating treatment effects from observational data. However, its correctness relies on the untestable (and frequently implausible) assumption that all confounders have been measured. This article introduces robust sensitivity analysis IPW estimates range of compatible with given amount unobserved confounding. The estimated converges to narrowest possible interval (under assumptions) must contain true effect. Our proposal refinement influential by Zhao, Small, and Bhattacharya, which we show gives bounds are too wide even asymptotically. based new partial identification results Tan’s marginal model. Supplementary materials this available online.
منابع مشابه
Comparing Weighting Methods in Propensity Score Analysis
The propensity score method is frequently used to deal with bias from standard regression in observational studies. The propensity score method involves calculating the conditional probability (propensity) of being in the treated group (of the exposure) given a set of covariates, weighting (or sampling) the data based on these propensity scores, and then analyzing the outcome using the weighted...
متن کاملSpatial Interpolation via Inverse Path Distance Weighting
The R package ipdw provides functions for interpolation of georeferenced point data via Inverse Path Distance Weighting. Useful for coastal marine applications where barriers in the landscape preclude interpolation with Euclidean distances. This method of interpolation requires significant computation and is only practical for relatively small and coarse grids. The ipdw implementation may provi...
متن کاملVariable selection for propensity score estimation via balancing covariates.
We first define some notation. Let Y denote the response of interest and X denote a p-dimensional vector of covariates. Let T denote a binary indicator of treatment exposure: T = 1 if treated, T = 0 if control. (Yi,Xi, Ti), i = 1, . . . , n, is a random sample from (Y,X, T ). We further define Y (1) as the potential outcome if the subject were treated and Y (0) as the potential outcome if the s...
متن کاملComparing approaches to causal inference for longitudinal data: inverse probability weighting versus propensity scores.
In observational studies for causal effects, treatments are assigned to experimental units without the benefits of randomization. As a result, there is the potential for bias in the estimation of the treatment effect. Two methods for estimating the causal effect consistently are Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) and the Propensity Score (PS). We demonstrate that in many simple c...
متن کاملWeighting regressions by propensity scores.
Regressions can be weighted by propensity scores in order to reduce bias. However, weighting is likely to increase random error in the estimates, and to bias the estimated standard errors downward, even when selection mechanisms are well understood. Moreover, in some cases, weighting will increase the bias in estimated causal parameters. If investigators have a good causal model, it seems bette...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the American Statistical Association
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0162-1459', '1537-274X', '2326-6228', '1522-5445']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2022.2069572